It’s not written to justify other robberies in the sport (believe me, they exist). It is not here to discredit those who believe Manny was robbed. This post was not written with the intent on proving why Jeff Horn deserved the win. There’s an interesting Instagram video I came upon that addresses why this fight was not a robbery and even delves into psychology of how our perception of the outcome of this fight is influenced. Instead of legitimate discussion about the event through and through, the focus is on the decision. (once again, an actual fighter) into agreeing with his decision rather than highlighting the fightas compelling and giving Jeff Horn his credit. Smith took over for no-name Max Kellerman and bullied Timothy Bradley Jr. Unfortunately, world renowned boxing analyst Stephen A. (an actual fighter) authentically confirmed that this fight was a lot closer than most thought, breathing life into the doubt of Pacquiao’s dominance. No, instead we’re going to remember a group of loud-mouth analysts yell and complain about their opinions being contradicted by the actual outcome. Not the overall greatness of the back-and-forth battle between legend and unknown. Not the massive Australian attendance and success of the event. Not the hugely successful ESPN broadcast ratings. Not for the near-death 9th round that led the referee to threaten to end the fight. Not Pacman’s adjustment and perseverance throughout the fight. Not the unlikely challenge of the unknown underdog Jeff Horn bringing it to the Pacman. Because the fight went to a decision and some people the whole freaking world did not agree with it, that’s what this fight will be remembered for. But it’s also the kind of thing that tarnishes the legacy of the fights. That’s what comes from these types of results. Lot’s of points and discussions to be made. The more marketable team gets the greater share of attention. It’s why the discussion for the 2016 NBA Finals was the record setting Warriors blew a 3-1 lead instead of the Cavaliers mounting a comeback, why the 2016 MLB World Series is about the Chicago Cubs overcoming a 3-1 deficit rather than the Cleveland Indians losing 3 straight. He’s more marketable and thus a better talking point. The focus of this fight will be on Pacquiao’s loss or “robbery” for many reasons. Pacquiao is a very likable guy and a legend in our time. Compubox numbers show Pacquiao having a drastically higher success rate with his punches and a 9th round from hell didn’t do the Hornet any favors. The argument for Pacquiao winning that fight is a lot easier to understand and a safer choice for those not looking to get shit on by the infallible Internet.īoxing analysts around the world saw what the judges supposedly could not. The judges unanimously awarded Horn the victory and the world was shocked. It went the distance and seemed like the event was a success. The fight was massively exciting, each fighter shining at different times throughout the bloody and exciting fight. Philadelphia, more like Brisbane Australia. Apollo Creed, say hello to 8-division champion Manny Pacquiao. Rocky Balboa, meet unknown underdog Jeff Horn. The spectacle, the narrative, the characters, and the titular fight itself was tit-for-tat a carbon copy of the film. That identification was relatively spot on. Horn was a comparison to the all-time classic “Rocky”. A common reference of the ESPN coverage of Pacquiao vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |